SiteSucker is an application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet. Files, sitesucker 2 11 12 MAS TNT.zip (4.13 MB). Download Free SiteSucker 2.11.12 for Mac on Mac Torrent Download. SiteSucker 3.0.1 is an Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web. SiteSucker 3.0 is an Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web. It does this by asynchronously copying the site's webpages. SiteSucker is a Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet. It does this by asynchronously copying the. SiteSucker is an Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet. SiteSucker 2.11.11 | Name sitesucker 2 11 11 MAS TNT.zip Size 4.49 MB Created on 20:29:52 Hash. Download SiteSucker for Mac - A lightweight and user-friendly application that provides the tools one needs to easily download entire websites from the Internet. SiteSucker 2.11.12 is an Macintosh application that automatically downloads Web sites from the Internet. Version 2.11.11: Fixed various bugs.Ensured that files always finish downloading after resuming. Download the latest versions of the best Mac apps at safe and trusted MacUpdate. SiteSucker 3.1 - Automatically downloads complete Web sites. SiteSucker is a Macintosh application that automatically downloads from Internet websites. SiteSucker 2.11.11 MAS | Mac OS X | 4 MB. It does this by copying the site's HTML documents, images, backgrounds. Just enter a URL and click a button and SiteSucker can download the entire site. It does this by copying the site's HTML documents, images, backgrounds, movies, and other files to your local hard drive. Something like SiteSucker makes a lot more sense than cloning a site for helping folks archive their work so that it can be accessible for the long term, and building that feature into Reclaim Hosting’s services would be pretty cool. All those database driven sites need to be updated, maintained, and protected from hackers and spam. One option is cloning a site in Installatron on Reclaim Hosting, but that requires a dynamic database for a static copy, why not just suck that site? And while cloning a site using Installatron is cheaper and easier given it’s built into Reclaim offerings, it’s not all that sustainable for us or them. And to reinforce that point, right after I finished sucking this site, a faculty member submitted a support ticket asking the best way to archive a specific moment of a site so that they could compare it with future iterations. I can see more than a few uses for my own sites, not to mention the many others I help support. I don’t pay for that many applications, but this is one that was very much worth the $5 for me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |